On the other hand, why think that the discussion for the woman, covered lady gaga terry richardson

by comma Media, Sociology Labels: religion, religion in public, feminism, woman, a Muslim woman, the Albanian woman, coverage of the head, mizogjinia, Objectification of women, patriarchy, patrimonializmi, scarf, religious symbols in public
These days all the attention is on Meta priest, two unscrupulous as community economic and political elite, friendly and hostile to them, which overshadowed lady gaga terry richardson a debate that I thought I would be a little more durable: it covered women. The latter affects more than half of the population directly; He Meta-priest, the entire population, which as an open field concentric waves of expanding into space, covering all of Albania, with strength greater corruption in the smaller center towards the periphery.
But, when such numbers are why more discussion care for women? Because tapping does not solve anything. Our problem there are some grains, but the whole system. Even if the most optimistic projections are realized under which the card is already Meta burn as political figure will definitely go to jail (which should lady gaga terry richardson happen, if only to swoop millet and think that there is a modicum of hope for that country, which then allows other caterpillar survival lady gaga terry richardson s'numërohen of which are still in power), the question is what will be done with those who are not are not tapped into the hands busy doing leek illegal racket (no legitimate racket)? So, do not strongly entuziazmon this event, because, like the fact that Meta was caught eavesdropping, as well as publication of this event constitutes or faceoff and anger, or coincidence. But we have a whole political class in different ways measure is corrupted, from which hangs a whole society, that measure different ways manipulates people for benefits, which has neither idealism lady gaga terry richardson nor the purpose of improve whatnot. As will be removed rid of this class? Being tapped every member of illegally?
Ok. To say that 2000 times tapping was successful and, through him, disappeared in 2000 trash politics. lady gaga terry richardson The point is that, if this problem solved so therefore, not because our culture and mass varies lady gaga terry richardson institutional control force of law, but because it works surveillance of cubash to cubash, have not solved anything. Whoever will take the place of those that were removed, will be of the same category, if not astute ei sterling in its relations corrupt. And will have a new tool more powerful, even more illegal than previous surveillance to catch them young these measures. This method would logically lead, after some time, in a final resort, faster and direct: vigilante lady gaga terry richardson gangs with the law, to execute the death whomever they decide that, according to their code, resulting lady gaga terry richardson Being. So open the way anarchy; and later, when these bands are legitimized the coming to power, fascism. So people's culture degenerates further, the human values die.
On the other hand, why think that the discussion for the woman, covered lady gaga terry richardson or not, should be a continuous discussion by all parties in Albania, from those who detests coverings, those who think that, under the law of rules, no place in school and state institutions, and those who call the spiritual needs of its religious duty use? The cover itself is relatively little interest me, whatever will do ç'mundesha the conviction of the people that I listen to the futility of its religious meaning or practical, lady gaga terry richardson and user manipulation and abusive that incorporates symbolic coverage. What interests me most strongly in this discussion, is something lady gaga terry richardson vital to our society lady gaga terry richardson than snot-joshami issue: the problem of the treatment of women by the Albanian society as a whole; culture, meanings and expectations that have built in relation to the female. For me, our society lives, produces and reinforces still a feudal mentality in relation to women. But this problem, unlike that of Meta and Prifti, can solve becoming permanent central and public discussion, however, likely to take more time. Moreover, for social emancipation in relation to women, public qendrorësinë see as the most efficient way (however complex) towards durable solutions progressive change.
However, in the discussion of "Coat" in recent weeks, I have noticed some defocusing of the problem that needs to be fundamental, and an exit out of secondary problems. Attention focuses on whether the use of the headscarf (who later from different writers take different forms required coverage of women) should be allowed in school or not, is characteristic of a religion or of all, it is a matter of religion or cultural tradition wider that religion, the question is logically in the discussion or totalitarian performances, is the problem of France or Turkey, and includes lady gaga terry richardson or excludes lady gaga terry richardson our law school, etc. More immediately apparent when I read that "scarf" or "cloak" become sovereign and omnipotent;