Today, my dear, you

Today, my dear, you'll see how faithful they feel that they earn from home without any effort, the question of all bedside theistic religions (yes, those are the d-atheist). In response to a comment by Article mosab hassan Time atheist religion in schools. Humiliated in front of fellow mosab hassan atheist because it's exposed several reasons why religions are lies, here you meet a Christian (I assume that is Christian): Sorry, but you start from the idea that you want to prove: that religion is the work of man. If you have found what religion is, that the connection between man and divinity, you have to reach such conclusions. You started from atheism and you get everything from atheism, mosab hassan of course. I felt compelled to answer, because the sake of it, committed a serious error: Bzzzt. You go from the idea that you want to prove that there is a god and your religion in your sect (yes, Catholicism and Orthodoxy or are sects, mosab hassan this is the term used by sects large at small sects) as it is practiced by you is how your god wants to be practiced. The assumption behind the other is people who know that there are a number of books that are nothing higher than a human product mosab hassan of the times in which they occurred (no bible is not a book but a collection of books), have timelines that are perfect agreement with the idea of human origin, we have hundreds of self-contradictions and inconsistencies clear that we know things mosab hassan have happened or not (ex. the dead who allegedly came to visit the graves of relatives - it's mosab hassan absurd to think that something happened but even a non-Christian to be noted that, like resurrections were as common as TVs today). mosab hassan So, my dear, if you believed in what you claim, it's your job to prove 1) that there is a God, 2) that communicated with God that thy holy books favorite authors, 3) that what is communicated true (ie that the god that is not misleading or understood by Christians, not the work of Satan), 4) what is written mosab hassan in your holy books is in line with what was discussed and what happened. And only then can we speak of conversion. So, my dear, I wish you success. PS: If you want, in my generosity, I can go on the assumption that you have shown that there is a god, got rid of one, just to see that you're mosab hassan still a long way to make your favorite ideology even worthy of being taken into calculating true things possible. That's about the size of it. Any natural mosab hassan explanation, however implausible, it is more plausible than any supernatural explanation. And that's a very simple reason, we know that the natural exist only interact with it. Supernatural has not even been shown that there is not someone interacted with him clearly, mosab hassan with solid evidence. If there were supernatural, would be three possible cases: either we do not detract from, or we can interact with it consistently or supernatural sticks his tail inconsistently in the material world and we can not challenge it in any way (supernatural acts on the natural unpredictably and does not respond to stimuli). If one is where the supernatural (SN) is irrelevant and not tested because we do not detract and we can not say anything about it. Case 2 is where you can make predictions about interactions, mosab hassan thus, ironically, methodological naturalism would include the SN natural because we can test and see how they react, so we could develop his model and we can test it. Case 3 is where SN is indistinguishable from random processes, mosab hassan by chance, and, again, is irrelevant because we can not say anything definitive mosab hassan about SN because we can not build any model in any respect his.
Or, in short, Russell's teapot. Of course you have to give him the link and then make Wikipedia scandal that dares to compare God with a kettle. mosab hassan There is no point to use logic, increase (s) Tinie have no idea what that is. However, I am curious, how comes atheist religion? mosab hassan Oo It's not a paradox? September 29, 2011, 1:30 p.m.
Scientology, raelianismul, some forms of Buddhism is atheistic religions. A religion should not postulate a central deity, but the beliefs addressed (supernatural origin mosab hassan - but not theistic - or mundane) can be regarded mosab hassan religion. mosab hassan Unlike mosab hassan simple faith religion has a ritualistic component, a developed theology, dogma and impose behavioral mosab hassan patterns, etc. September 30, 2011, 3:47 p.m.
Anonim: It's not the teapot. Teapot is illustrative to show the burden of proof. This is rather a false dichotomy stitching with little burden of proof reversed. September 30, 2011, 9:52 p.m.
@ Robot 'service: Aha. I think it is, by definition, "The belief mosab hassan in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, esp. A personal God or gods." But I see that there are other The definitions